The protocol
Patients with head injury requiring ventilation and intra-cranial pressure monitoring will be considered for the trial. Entry will be determined using the above inclusion and exclusion criteria and following consent for the next of kin. Patients will be managed on intensive care units using a standard protocol
(figure 3). The major objective of this protocol is to maintain ICP<25 mmHg by applying treatment measures in a number of stages.
Stage 1 - initial treatment measures:
Patients will be sedated, analgesed and ventilated. Patients may or may not be paralysed but this must be noted. They will be nursed head up with no venous obstruction. Invasive monitoring (central venous pressure and arterial lines as a minimum will be applied).
Targets for physiological parameters will be:
Cerebral perfusion pressure > 60 mmHg (central venous pressure 6-10),
Oxygen saturation >97%,
Arterial CO2 = 4.5-5.0 kPa,
Temperature <37ēC,
Blood sugar 4-7 mmol/l.
The ICP will be assessed at this stage. If the ICP<20mmHg, the above medical treatment will continue. If the ICP>20mmHg, a repeat scan will be considered to investigate the presence of an evolving mass lesion and stage 2 will be applied.
Stage 2 - advanced treatment measures:
In stage 2 the following measures can be considered, all of which are optional:
Barbiturates are not implemented as part of stage 2, but are reserved as part of continued medical treatment following randomisation. This clause enables a direct comparison between the efficacy of decompressive craniectomy and extended medical treatment including the introduction of barbiturate coma.
If despite stage 1 and 2 measures, the ICP remains above 25mmHg for 1 to 12 hours then patients will be randomised to either continued medical treatment stage 2 but also including barbiturates (e.g. thiopentone boluses + infusion 4-8 mg/kg/hr) or to surgical treatment (decompressive craniectomy). Treatment following randomisation should be implemented within 4-6 hours.
The surgical treatment will comprise:
(a) for unilateral hemisphere swelling / a large unilateral fronto-temporo-parietal craniectomy
or
(b) for bilateral diffuse hemisphere swelling a large bilateral fronto-temporo-parietal craniectomy from the frontal sinus anteriorly to the coronal suture posteriorly and pterion laterally with a wide dural opening (pedicles based on the superior sagittal sinus medially and division of the falx anteriorly).
If continued medical treatment is drawn no decompressive surgery will be performed at the time of randomisation, but decompressive surgery may be performed later at the clinician's discretion if the patient subsequently deteriorates (for example prolonged and unacceptably high ICP >40mm Hg with compromised CPP). This clause is required if a situation arises whereby the treating physician feels that withholding surgery is acting against the best interest of the individual - "the interests of the patient always prevails over those of science and society". The same principle applies to barbiturates in the decompressive craniectomy group.
Imaging:
CT scans will be read centrally and include the following:
(a) Presentation CT scan
(b) Pre-randomisation CT scan after stage 1 / 2 to check no evolving mass lesion
(c) CT scan 72 hours post-randomisation
Power
The total number of patients will be 400 (200 in each arm of the study) for a 15% difference in outcome (increase in favourable outcome from 45% to 60%) (power=80%, p=0.05).
Outcome measures
1. The primary endpoint will be assessment of outcome at discharge (Glasgow Outcome Score) and 6 months (Extended Glasgow Outcome Score).22
2. Secondary endpoints will be:
a. Assessment of outcome using the SF-3623 and SF-10 ( for children
below 16 years of age) questionnaires
b. Assessment of ICP control
c. Time in intensive care
d. Time to discharge from the neurosurgical unit.
e.
Detailed health-economic analysis
3. Additional assessment of outcome using the above measures will be performed at 1 year and 2 years after the injury.
For patients undergoing decompressive craniectomy, it is recommended that the bone flap is replaced within six months of the initial injury.
Acknowledgements
This protocol has evolved as a result of discussions between representatives of the University of Cambridge and the European Brain Injury Consortium including the participants of the intra-dural lesion study.
Table 1. Results of East Anglian Regional Audit of Head Injury.
|
Head
injury
|
Periods
|
Favourable
|
Severe disability/ PVS |
Dead
|
|
% *<0.05 | ||||
|
All |
1991 - 1993
|
56
|
21
|
23
|
|
1994 - 1997 |
66
|
13
|
20
| |
|
Severe |
1991 - 1993
|
40*
|
32
|
28
|
|
1994 - 1997 |
60*
|
21
|
22
| |
References:
1.American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma. Advanced Trauma Life Support for Doctors. Chicago: American College of Surgeons, 1997.
2.Report of the working party on the management of patients with head injuries. London: Royal College of Surgeons of England, 1999.
3. Jennett B, MacMillan R. Epidemiology of head injury. Br Med Journal 1981;282:101-4
4.Hutchinson PJ, Kirkpatrick PJ, Addison J, Jackson S, and Pickard JD. The management of minor traumatic brain injury. J Accid Emerg Med 15, 84-88. 1998. 5.Patel HC, Menon DK, Tebbs S, Hawker R, Hutchinson PJ, Kirkpatrick PJ. Specialist neurocritical care and outcome from head injury. Intensive Care Med 2002;28:547-53.
6.Menon DK. Cerebral protection in severe brain injury: physiological determinants of outcome and their optimisation. Br Med Bull 1999;55:226-58.
7.Menon DK, Matta BF. Intensive care after acute head injury. In: Matta B, Menon D, Turner J, eds. Neuroanesthesia and Neurointensive Care. London: Greenwich Medical Media 2000: 301-17.
8.Gaab MR, Rittierodt M, Lorenz M, Heissler HE. Traumatic brain swelling and operative decompression: A prospective investigation. Acta Neurochir Suppl Wien 1990;51:326-8.
9.Hatashita S, Koga N, Hosaka Y, Tagaki S. Acute subdural hematoma: Severity of injury, surgical intervention, and mortality. Neurol Med Chir(Tokyo) 1993;33:13-8.
10.Polin RS, Shaffery ME, Bogaev CA, Tisdale N, Germanson T, Bocchichio B , Jane JA. Decompressive bifrontal craniectomy in the treatment of severe refractory posttraumatic cerebral oedema. Neurosurgery 1997;41:84-94.
11.Kunze E, Meixensberger J, Janka M, Sorensen N, Roosen K. Decompressive craniectomy in patients with uncontrollable intracranial hypertension. Acta Neurochir Suppl 1998;71:16-8.
12.Kleist-Welch Guerra W, Gaab MR, Dietz H, Mueller JU, Piek J, Fritsch MJ. Surgical decompression for traumatic brain swelling: Indications and results. J Neurosurg 1999;90:187-96.
13.Munch E, Horn P, Schurer L, Piepgas A, Torsten P, Schmidek P. Management of severe traumatic brain injury by decompressive craniectomy. Neurosurgery 2000;47:315-23.
14.Taylor A, Butt W, Rosenfeld J, Shann F, Ditchfield M, Lewis E, Klug G, Wallace D, Henning R, Tibballs J. A randomized trial of very early decompressive craniectomy in children with traumatic brain injury and sustained intracranial hypertension. Childs Nerv Syst 2001;17:154-62.
15.De Luca GP, Volpin L, Fornezza U, Cervellini P, Zanusso M, Casentini L, Curri D, Piacentino M, Bozzato G, Colombo F. The role of decompressive craniectomy in the treatment of uncontrollable post-traumatic intracranial hypertension. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2000;76:401-4.
16.Meier U, Zeilinger FS, Henzka O. The use of decompressive craniectomy for the management of severe head injuries. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2000;76:475-8.
17. Whitfield PC, Patel H, Hutchinson PJ, Czosnyka M, Parry D, Menon D, Pickard JD, Kirkpatrick PJ. Bifrontal decompressive craniectomy in the management of posttraumatic intracranial hypertension. Br J Neurosurg 2001;15:500-7.
18.Csokay A, Pataki G, Nagy L, Belan K. Vascular tunnel construction in the treatment of severe brain swelling caused by trauma and SAH. (evidence based on intra-operative blood flow measure). Neurol Res 2002;24:157-60.
19.Schneider GH, Bardt T, Lanksch WR, Unterberg A. Decompressive craniectomy following traumatic brain injury: ICP, CPP and neurological outcome. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2002;81:77-9.
20. Kontopoulos V, Foroglou N, Patsalas J, Magras J, Foroglou G, Yiannakou-Pephtoulidou M, Sofianos E, Anastassiou H, Tsaoussi G. Decompressive craniectomy for the management of patients with refractory hypertension: should it be reconsidered? Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2002;144:791-6.
21.Mendelow AD. Surgical trial in intracerebral haemorrhage (S.T.I.C.H.). Acta Neurochir Suppl 2000;76:521-2.
22.Wilson JT, Pettigrew LE, Teasdale GM. Structured interviews for the Glasgow Outcome Scale and the Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale: guidelines for their use. J Neurotrauma 1998;573-85.
23. Jenkinson C, Wright L, Coulter A. Quality of life measurement in health care: a review of measures, and population norms for the UK SF-36. Oxford: Health Services Research Unit 1993.
